INTRODUCTION
The series exceeds seven episodes and continues. I didn’t plan it this way; it simply evolved.
Debunking the polytheistic nature of Arthurian and Grail traditions by analyzing Julius Evola led me to unveil other heretical and spurious doctrines.
These mystery religion narratives share similar concepts, a syncretism spanning East and West, aligning with diverse cultural conceptions.
Many considered Evola a fascist or associated with the regime. However, his visions differed greatly from the proletarian ideals of Hitler’s and Mussolini’s socialism. For Julius Evola, tradition encompassed kings, queens, emperors, eagles, esotericism, and the mystery religions of the powerful.
The source of this confusion lies in the fact that Hitler’s message to the German people centered on socialism and empowering the German workers.
Yet, behind closed doors, Himmler sought to reinstate the old German order of knights, the Teutonic Knights. According to Julius Evola, Himmler used historical material to grasp the symbolism of hermetic traditions, attempting to acquire esoteric knowledge of kings for his circle of terrorists and lunatics.
These are the primary reasons for choosing Evola, as he possessed a strong understanding of the opponent’s narrative and of heretical polytheistic traditions.
Before each new section, I typically include either an introduction or a commentary.
I may sometimes be repetitive, or express the same ideas in a different way. This is intentional. I openly repeat points because I want to clarify the confusing narrative pushed by these mysterious religions for the elect.
You will also find lines of biblical passages against idolatry to help reinforce the central argument of this essay: that these stories do not represent Christian values, and do not sound at all like the teachings of Jesus and the apostles, which they like to insert into their heretical fables.
Though powerful, this is the cult of fools, and my hope is that I can somehow pique your interest in this topic. It is important to understand that there is a ruling class that, even today, continues to believe through the same oaths in what the majority would consider absurd.
ESSAY INTRODUCTION
In this series, we will explore the heretical myths hidden behind medieval lore — kingship, the Grail, the Golden Age of the New Age, Parsifal, and King Arthur. Together in this essay, we will unveil the Gnostic and polytheistic nature behind these heroic stories and fairy tales.
These tales, which may appear to be mere myths, conceal meanings intended for initiates following the traditions of mystery religions. They are Gnostic because they are based on secret initiations, some of which were reserved only for the elite.
From childhood, we have been exposed to these stories in their softened Walt Disney versions and in various books— beautifully animated, accompanied by enchanting music, and brought into our homes to stay. It is no surprise that Walt Disney himself was a “DeMolay,” a member of a Masonic order that venerates Jacques de Molay, the last Grand Master of the Order of the Templars.
The Templars were Gnostics. Although there has been a modern campaign to absolve them of accusations of worshiping satanic idols such as Baphomet, a closer examination of the traditions from which they emerged reveals that they were not Christians. In fact, many of these Templars were descendants of royal bloodlines.
Once you learn to decode these stories, it becomes clear that the spurious doctrines originating from Babylon and Egypt have survived. The worship of fallen angels has been concealed within fairy tales and initiatory legends. This is the mystery religion of the potentates — the very one our Lord Jesus Christ warned us about.
These circles were the place that formed the mentality and the like of Disney. In fact, you will barely find a cartoon by this company that doesn’t involve the glorification of magic, sorcerers, witches, along with a sickening amount of subliminal messages.
In this article, we are not going to delve deeply into Walt Disney; other articles will follow up on this matter. I just mention it because the efforts of the elite to normalize all these heretical stories and make them appealing again to a new generation have been absolutely massive.
The resources used for this study are multiple. A great resource to analyze the esoteric teachings behind these traditions has been the controversial philosopher Julius Evola.
I’m not going to use part of his work because I believe in the genuineness of these doctrines. These heretical teachings are connected with beliefs that go back to the mystery religion of Babylon and the Egyptians. Evola exalts the secrecy and the value of initiation, swearing oaths and doing literally everything that God doesn’t appreciate.
Julius Evola belonged to the esoteric Italian group of the 1900s. The UR Group was an Italian esotericist association, founded around 1927 by intellectuals including Julius Evola, Arturo Reghini, and Giovanni Colazza for the study of Traditionalism and Magic.
And this is the only reason why we are using Evola’s studies, not because we agree with his views, but because in esoteric circles he was considered a true philosopher. It is a necessity to interact with this literature in order to unmask the meanings behind these gnostic heresies.
Again, we don’t want to raise any curiosity toward these doctrines. This writing seeks to convey that you should not be under the impression that there are spiritual gains or progress to be discovered in magical practices, or historical initiation methods.
This is a list of all the classic works on the subject that have been analyzed. The stories are, of course, a little different from the adaptations that we are used to watching in these modern times. This list is a great starting point for your own further research.
1. Robert de Boron — Joseph d’Arimathie (often cited as Joseph of Arimathea / part of the Borron cycle) — late 12th / early 13th century.
(Robert de Boron is usually dated to the late 1100s / very early 1200s; he is credited with linking the Grail to Joseph of Arimathea.)
2. Robert de Boron (cycle items: Merlin, other Borron texts — part of the Robert de Boron cycle) — late 12th / early 13th century.
3.Chrétien de Troyes — Perceval, ou Le Conte du Graal (Perceval / “Story of the Grail”) — late 12th century (c. 1180s).
(Chrétien’s unfinished verse Perceval is the first appearance in vernacular literature of an explicitly “Grail” object.)
4. (Continuations/Interpolations of Chrétien’s Perceval) — continuing authors/continuations named by medieval manuscripts:
-
Gautier (Gaucher/Gautier) de Doulens — first continuation — late 12th / early 13th c. (continuation tradition).
-
Manessier — second continuation — early 13th c.
-
Gerbert de Montreuil (interpolation) — early 13th c.
(These are the medieval continuations/interpolations that extend Chrétien’s unfinished romance.)
5. The so-called Grand Saint Graal (the Prose Grail / Estoire / early prose treatments) — early 13th century (prose cycle developments around 1200–1230s).
6. Perceval (prose versions — Perceval li Gallois, prose treatments derived from Chrétien’s poem) — early 13th century (prose redactions contemporary with the Vulgate/Post-Vulgate tradition).
7.The Queste del Saint Graal (the Quest of the Holy Grail — penultimate part of the Lancelot / Vulgate / Lancelot-Grail cycle) — c. 1225–1230 (13th century).
(The Queste is the major 13th-century prose work that turns the quest into an explicitly spiritual/mystical search
8. Wolfram von Eschenbach — Parzival (Parzifal) — early 13th century (commonly dated c. 1200–1210).
(Wolfram’s Parzival is the principal German Grail romance; Evola draws on Wolfram’s version and its associations.)
9. Albert von Scharfenberg — Titurel (and related fragments / the Titurel tradition) — early 13th century.
(Titurel is an associated German text often paired with Wolfram’s Parzival.)
10. Sir Thomas Malory — Le Morte d’Arthur — completed c. 1469–1470; first printed 1485.
(Malory’s mid-/late-15th-century compilation reworks and preserves many Grail episodes
11. Heinrich von dem Türlin — Diu Crône (Diu Crône) — early 13th century (c. first half of 1200s).
CHAPTER 1
In this initial part, Evola brings about a synthesis of all the connections that he is going to make later. This will give the reader an overview of all the topics that will be unfolded and expanded later: Arthurian lore, the Grail, and Rings are the analyses that will follow in the next articles.
From now on, it will be Julius Evola’s writings. All these concepts that I rewrote come straight from him and from his book:
The Mystery of the Grail: Initiation and Magic in the Quest for the Spirit
When the texts comprising the Grail cycle are examined individually, it becomes evident that they reiterate a limited number of fundamental motifs, articulated through the symbolism of chivalric figures and their deeds.
What emerges, therefore, are essentially themes concerning a mysterious center; a quest accompanied by spiritual trials; and a royal succession or restoration, which at times takes the form of an act of healing or vengeance.
Percival, Gawain, Galahad, Ogier, Lancelot, and Peredur may be regarded as different designations for a single archetypal figure; similarly, King Arthur, Joseph of Arimathea, Prester John, and the Fisher King represent parallel manifestations of another thematic type.
Correspondingly, the depictions of enigmatic castles, islands, kingdoms, and remote or perilous realms are likewise equivalent symbols. Within the narratives, these elements are presented in sequences that simultaneously generate a peculiar, dreamlike atmosphere while, at times, producing a certain repetitiveness.
Traditional teachings, though expressed in diverse forms, have universally maintained the belief in the existence of a primordial race embodying a transcendent spirituality. For this reason, such a race was often regarded as divine or “godlike.”
I have described its structure as Olympian—a term intended to denote an inherent superiority, a nature that is essentially superhuman. Within this race there was a force descending from above, a presence that predestined it to sovereignty and to the royal function. It was perceived as the race of “those who are” and “those who can,” and at times as a solar race.
The widespread belief in a Golden Age, found across numerous traditions, represents a distant recollection of this primordial race.
A transition thus occurred from the theme of the Golden Age to that of a metaphysical kingdom, to which all rulers “from above” are linked in a mysterious, objective, and ontological manner. This applies both to the genuine heirs of the primordial tradition and to those who, with varying degrees of awareness and fidelity, sought to reproduce the archetypal form of regnum within particular lands and civilizations. In this way, the traditional notion of an invisible “King of Kings,” “Universal Ruler,” or “King of the World” became associated with a set of symbols—some deriving directly from analogy, others being mythologized memories of the lands where the primordial Olympian cycle once unfolded.
Foremost among these are symbols of centrality: the center, the pole, the region at the world’s axis, the cornerstone or foundation, and the magnet. Next are symbols of stability: the island encircled by waters, the rock, the immovable stone. Finally, there are symbols of inviolability and inaccessibility: the invisible or unfindable castle or land, the wild mountain summit, the subterranean realm. Added to these are images such as the “Land of Light,” the “Land of the Living,” and the “Holy Land.” Likewise, the manifold variations of golden symbolism encompass notions of solarity, light, kingship, immortality, and incorruptibility—qualities that have always been associated with the primordial tradition and with the age characterized by gold. Other symbols evoke “life” in its higher sense (for example, the “perennial food” or the “Tree of Life”), transcendent knowledge, and invincible power. All of these elements appear interwoven within the symbolic, mythic, or poetic representations that, across traditions, have prefigured the enduring theme of the invisible regnum and the Supreme Center of the world, in itself and in its various manifestations and reflections.
The corresponding myth is that of the Titanic or Luciferian revolt, or the Promethean attempt to seize the Olympian fire. The age of the “giants,” or of the Wolf, or of the “elemental beings,” represents an equivalent motif, preserved in various traditions and in the fragmented legends and epics of numerous peoples. The final epoch is the Iron Age, or, in Hindu terminology, the Dark Age (Kali Yuga). This period encompasses every desacralized civilization—those that acknowledge and glorify only what is human and terrestrial. In response to such forms of decline, the notion of a potential cycle of restoration arose, which Hesiod identified as the heroic cycle or the age of heroes. Here, the term heroic must be understood in a specific, technical sense, distinct from its ordinary usage. According to Hesiod, the “generation of heroes” was created by Zeus—that is, by the Olympian principle—with the potential to recover the primordial state and thereby inaugurate a renewed “golden” cycle.
These archetypes recur in the “heroic” figures of nearly all traditions.
In the Hellenic–Achaean tradition, for example, Heracles is portrayed as a paradigmatic hero in precisely these terms. His perpetual adversary, Hera, embodies the supreme goddess of the lunar-pantheistic cult. Heracles attains Olympian immortality by allying himself with Zeus—the Olympian principle—against the “giants.” According to one of the myths within this cycle, it is through Heracles that the “titanic” element (symbolized by Prometheus) is ultimately liberated and reconciled with the Olympian element.
Another fundamental traditional doctrine, which I have discussed elsewhere with supporting documentation, concerns the location of the primordial seat or center of the Olympian civilization of the Golden Age within a Boreal, or Nordic-Boreal, region that eventually became uninhabitable.
A tradition of Hyperborean origin—whether in its original Olympian form or in later heroic manifestations—lies at the foundation of the civilizing and founding deeds carried out by races that spread across the Eurasian continent between the end of the glacial period and the Neolithic era. Some of these peoples appear to have migrated directly from the North, while others seem to have originated in a Western-Atlantic land that functioned as a kind of replica of the Northern center. This dual inheritance explains the convergence of symbolic and legendary references that sometimes identify the primordial land as Northern-Arctic and at other times as Western. Among the many names applied to the Hyperborean center—and later also to the Atlantic one—are Thule or the “White Island,” the “Island of Splendor” (the Hindu Sveta-dvīpa; the Hellenic Leuke Island; the “original seed of the Aryan race,” or Ariyana Vaego, in ancient Iran), and the “Land of the Sun” or “Land of Apollo,” that is, Avalon.
AVALON AND THE MYSTICAL TUATHA DE DANANN (Nephilim Royal History)
Appendix A
The Hyperborean myth of Avalon seems like a story that became quite dear to that infamous Austrian painter. Many researchers happen to know that the terrorist Adolf Hitler took a lot of his beliefs from the occult,the Thule Society, the Theosophical Society, of the mother of the New Age heretical movement, Helena Blavatsky.
It becomes evident, therefore, that they did not originate anything fundamentally new. Rather, their intent was to secure the endorsement of occult or transcendent forces as a means of legitimizing a new form of authority to replace the older regimes. The so-called polar cults exhibit significant affinities with planetary worship and ancient Sabaean traditions. The emblem of the polar cult is the enigmatic fleur-de-lis, which later emerged as the symbol of Florence in the eleventh century.
Evola’s esotericism and Aleister Crowley’s esotericism may appear distinct, yet they represent two facets of the same coin.
Allow me to reveal the psychology underpinning this satanic deception and dismantle the fallacy of white magic’s existence and its supposed benevolence, along with the falsehood of benevolent spirits giving knowledge ; all are dangerous falsehoods, and the New Age has successfully misled many into believing otherwise.
By persuading the unfortunate individual that he will become a “solar warrior” or a white magician, these doctrines instill the conviction that he can wage war against malevolent forces enacting the teachings of numerous mystery cults.
This constitutes a profound deception, indeed, an insane one. Psychologically, the narcissism inherent in this thought process verges on true insanity.
Even if one is not a Christian, as I am, and therefore lacks the assurance that evil will be vanquished by God, one can still grasp how deceptive these cult narratives are.
These divinities possess a dualistic nature; consequently, engaging in such unnecessary battles would be akin to opening gateways to a realm of suffering that no one would ever desire in their life. Such individuals are neither happy nor benevolent. It is the insatiable thirst for ultimate knowledge and power that drives individuals to perpetrate the most heinous crimes.
Now, allow me to elaborate upon why I specify that a benevolent spirit, using their terminology, cannot manifest.
This is because the angels of the Lord serve the Lord alone, not us. Therefore, although they assist humanity, they would never accept a divination originating from human beings. Furthermore, the angels of the Creator would never work towards the fulfillment of base, worldly desires; they would be repulsed by such a request.
In polytheistic systems, things operate quite differently, because the spirits and demons aligned with Satan desire to be worshipped and regarded as gods, although gods they are not, given their lack of participation in creation, even prior to their rebellion. Consequently, the practitioner will debase themselves before these false deities in order to obtain fulfillment of desires, resorting to increasingly elaborate rituals to achieve this. It is akin to subscribing to a system of subservience; a form of spiritual dictatorship.
Therefore, when people pose the question – why would they engage in such behavior?
The answer lies in power, money, narcissism, position, control, perversions, manipulation, and psychological operations.
Evola continues:
For the present discussion, it is necessary to consider briefly the form assumed by these memories within the Celtic, and particularly the Irish, cycle—the traditions surrounding Avalon, the Tuatha Dé Danann, and the kingdom of Arthur.
At this stage in the development of Irish legend, one encounters an attempt at heroic restoration in the cycle of the Tuatha Dé Danann, whose name signifies “the people of the goddess Anu (or Danu).”
This race, according to one tradition, descended to Ireland from “heaven”—hence, as recorded in the Leabhar na h-Uidre (The Book of the Dun Cow), “their wisdom and the sublimity of their knowledge.” In another account, they are said to have acquired supernatural wisdom in the Hyperborean region.
These two versions do not conflict; rather, they complement one another, reflecting both the superhuman nature of the primordial center and the legend that the Tuatha descended from the surviving members of the Neimheidh race.
These survivors are said to have journeyed to the Hyperborean or Western-Atlantic land to attain supernatural knowledge, which accounts for their association with certain mystical objects, to be discussed later.
Since the race of Neimheidh is described as a “heavenly” and “ancient” lineage that was overthrown by a titanic cycle, the underlying meaning of the myth appears to be that of a reintegrative contact with the original spiritual center—a center that is simultaneously celestial and, in its geographical transposition, Hyperborean or Western-Atlantic.
This contact revives and confers a heroic character upon the new people, the Tuatha Dé Danann, who ultimately defeat the Fomorians and related races (such as the Fir Bolg) and take possession of Ireland. The leader of the Tuatha, Ogme, is a “solar” figure (Grian Áinech), bearing traits analogous to those of the Doric Heracles. Ogme is said to have captured the sword of the Fomorian king, a symbol of triumph and restored sovereignty.
At the same time, Avalon—the “White Island”—possesses the symbolic qualities of both a “polar” and “solar” realm. According to another possible etymology, Avalon corresponds to the “Island of Apollo,” the Greek deity known among the Celts as Ablun or Belen. Thus, Avalon signifies the solar land and the Hyperborean domain, for Apollo himself was regarded as a solar king associated with both the Golden Age and the Hyperborean region.
According to Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia Regum Britanniae, Britain was originally inhabited by giants, the most prominent of whom was Goemagot. Brutus, described as a descendant of the Trojans who founded Rome, is said to have exterminated these giants and thereby established the British tradition. Goemagot clearly corresponds to the biblical Gog and Magog, an allusion of considerable symbolic importance.
In sacred tradition, Gog and Magog represent demonic nations that will play a decisive role in the imperial myth. They parallel the Fomorians and the “elemental beings” or rinn thursi, against whom the divine heroes of the Edda—the Aesir—build a wall to prevent their incursion into the “Seat of the Center,” or Midgard, a specific representation of the primordial center. In a certain sense, these figures embody the demonic aspect of the collective or mass element of the world.
This concludes the first article, which serves as an introduction to a complex and multifaceted subject. In the forthcoming essays, we will examine in greater depth the spurious Arthurian narratives and their symbolic underpinnings. I would like to thank all readers—brothers and sisters—for their attention and engagement with this study.
It is understandable that some may hold these tales in high regard, particularly if they have grown up with them and formed strong attachments to their characters.
While personal sentiments of this kind are to be respected, it must nevertheless be stated that the modern humanistic and Masonic tendency to treat all ideas as equally valid constitutes a distortion of traditional Christian doctrine. Such an approach, by equating truth with falsehood, ultimately serves to obscure genuine spiritual discernment and to reinforce the confusion perpetuated by temporal powers.
Evola, along with many philosophers and aristocratic thinkers, appeared to overlook the clear admonitions found in Scripture. In their pursuit of power and hidden knowledge, they seemed to adopt the view that all means were permissible in the search for transcendence.
Yet this assumption stands in direct opposition to the biblical revelation. As the Apostle Paul explicitly teaches, “the gods of the nations” that stand behind pantheistic and idolatrous cults are not divine beings but demons (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:20–21). These entities are portrayed not as creators, but as corrupting influences within human history.
The biblical message consistently affirms that what God values most in humanity is not esoteric knowledge or ritual initiation, but love, integrity, and purity of heart.
From Genesis to Revelation, Scripture condemns idolatry in all its forms—not because God is jealous of material objects such as wood or stone, but because idolatry represents the deeper spiritual rebellion of humanity against its Creator.
To misunderstand this is to overlook the central struggle of human existence: the battle between truth and deception, between worship of the living God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit and submission to false powers that seek to obscure the truth.
Matthew 5:33-3
“Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ 34 But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37 All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.
Timothy Charged to Oppose False Teachers
3 As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain people not to teach false doctrines any longer 4 or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith. 5 The goal of this command is love, which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. 6 Some have departed from these and have turned to meaningless talk. 7 They want to be teachers of the law, but they do not know what they are talking about or what they so confidently affirm.
James 5:12: The Apostle James restates Jesus’s teaching, saying, “But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay”.
Colossians 2:8 – “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.”
1 Corinthians 2:5 – “That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.”
John 14:6 – “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
1 Timothy 2:5 – “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”
→ Rejects any intermediary or initiatory figure who claims access to divine mysteries.
Ephesians 2:8–9 – “For by grace are you saved through faith… not of works, lest any man should boast.”
→ Undermines all systems of initiation or “spiritual advancement” through human effort or secret practice.
2 Corinthians 11:13–14 – “For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”
Acts 19:19 – “Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together, and burned them before all men.”
Deuteronomy 18:10–12 – “There shall not be found among you anyone who… uses divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch… For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord.”
Leviticus 19:31 – “Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards, to be defiled by them.”
